清洁压裂液对煤炭、页岩结构及其吸附性能影响研究现状
张永健,段 硕,胡伟康
河北工程大学 矿业与测绘工程学院,河北 邯郸 056000
Research status of the influence of clean fracturing fluid on the structure and adsorption properties of coal and shale
Zhang Yongjian, Duan Shuo, Hu Weikang
School of Mining and Surveying and Mapping Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056000, China
摘要 近年来,清洁压裂液在国内油气田的实际应用中取得了较好的结果。本文简述了压裂液的组成,介绍了清洁压裂液的成胶机理,并综述了清洁压裂液对煤炭、页岩的物理化学性质、孔隙度以及吸附解吸的影响。通过分析总结发现清洁压裂液能改变煤炭、页岩的物理化学结构、比表面积以及孔隙度,清洁压裂液中含水量越多越会抑制瓦斯的吸附能力,并且清洁压裂液中的一系列添加剂会促进瓦斯的解吸和运移,有利于煤层气、页岩气的开采。
关键词 :
清洁压裂液 ,
煤炭 ,
页岩 ,
孔裂隙 ,
吸附解吸
Abstract : In recent years, clean fracturing fluid has achieved good results in the practical application of domestic oil and gas fields. This paper briefly describes the composition of fracturing fluid, introduces the gelation mechanism of clean fracturing fluid, and summarizes the effects of clean fracturing fluid on the physical and chemical properties, porosity, adsorption and desorption of coal and shale. Through analysis and summary, it is found that clean fracturing fluid can change the physical and chemical structure, specific surface area and porosity of coal and shale. The more water content in clean fracturing fluid will more easily inhibit the adsorption capacity of gas, and a series of additives in clean fracturing fluid will promote the desorption and migration of gas, which is conducive to the exploitation of coalbed methane and shale gas.
Key words :
clean fracturing fluid
coal
shale
pore fissure
adsorption desorption
作者简介 : 张永健( 1998— ),男,山东青州人。
[ 1 ] 李 欣. 清洁压裂液研究进展[ J ]. 能源化工,2018,39( 2 ):55 - 59.
[ 2 ] 张婷婷,张科良,王满学,等. 页岩气藏环境下清洁压裂液及其破胶研究[ J ]. 石油化工应用,2021,40( 7 ):24 - 29.
[ 3 ] 孙晗森. 我国煤层气压裂技术发展现状与展望[ J ]. 中国海上油气,2021,33( 4 ):120 - 128.
[ 4 ] 康毅力,陈德飞,李相臣. 压裂液处理对煤岩孔隙结构的影响[ J ]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,38( 5 ):102 - 108.
[ 5 ] 赵 辉. 清洁压裂液对中高阶煤吸附解吸特性的影响[ D ]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2021.
[ 6 ] Yang M, Lu Y, Ge Z, et al. Optimal selection of viscoelastic surfa-
ctant fracturing fluids based on influence on coal seam pores[ J ]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2020, 31( 6 ):2 179 - 2 190.
[ 7 ] 郭 伟. 表面活性剂选择性吸/脱附对低阶煤可浮性影响的研究[ D ]. 太原:太原理工大学,2019.
[ 8 ] 马椽栋,刘嘉友,张庆建,等. 基于响应面法优化SDBS对低阶煤泥浮选的促进作用[ J ]. 洁净煤技术,2019,25( 3 ):35 - 42.
[ 9 ] 陈海汇,范洪富,郭建平,等. 煤层气井水力压裂液分析与展望[ J ]. 煤田地质与勘探,2017,45( 5 ):33 - 40.
[ 10 ] H.C.Wang, X. Q. Cheng,J. J. Tian, et al. Permeability enhanc-
ement of low rank coal through acidization using H2S solution: An experimental study in the Kuqa-Bay Coalfield, Xinjiang, China[ J ]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 185: 106 476.
[ 11 ] Q, Song, H. Y. Zhao, J. W. Jia, et al. Effects of demineralization on the surface morphology, microcrystalline and thermal transformation characteristics of coal[ J ]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2020, 145: 104 716.
[ 12 ] 杨 枫. 清洁压裂液强化煤层瓦斯解吸渗流特性研究[ D ]. 重庆:重庆大学,2017.
[ 13 ] Sun Z, Zhang H, Wei Z, et al. Effects of slick water fracturing fluid on pore structure and adsorption characteristics of shale reservoir rocks[ J ]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2018, 51: 27 - 36.
[ 14 ] 王天一,曹 函,骆中山,等. 压裂液静态吸附下页岩储层微观结构响应试验研究[ C ]//. 2018年全国工程地质学术年会论文集,2018:648 - 654.
[ 15 ] Zhang Y, Li Z, Lai F, et al. Experimental investigation into the eff-
ects of fracturing fluid-shale interaction on pore structure and wettability[ J ]. Geofluids, 2021, 2021: 1 - 11.
[ 16 ] 吕奉章. 川南页岩储层与压裂液的相互作用规律研究[ D ]. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2020.
[ 17 ] 孙则朋,王永莉,吴保祥,等. 滑溜水压裂液与页岩储层化学反应及其对孔隙结构的影响[ J ]. 中国科学院大学学报,2018,35( 5 ):712 - 719.
[ 18 ] 陈天宇,赖冠明,程振宇,等. 酸化作用下龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构演化实验研究[ J ]. 煤炭学报,2019,44( 11 ): 3 480 - 3 490.
[ 19 ] Lane R H. Rock/fluid chemistry impacts on shale fracture behavior[ C ]//SPE international symposium on oilfield chemistry. OnePetr-
o, 2013.
[ 20 ] Huang Q, Liu S, Wu B, et al. Role of VES-based fracturing fluid on gas sorption and diffusion of coal: An experimental study of Illinois basin coal[ J ]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 148: 1 243 - 1 253.
[ 21 ] 聂百胜,柳先锋,郭建华,等. 水分对煤体瓦斯解吸扩散的
影响[ J ]. 中国矿业大学学报,2015,44( 5 ):781 - 787.
[ 22 ] 何 涛. 水分对煤瓦斯解吸性能及力学特性的影响研究[ D ]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2015.
[ 23 ] 陈向军,程远平,王 林. 外加水分对煤中瓦斯解吸抑制作用试验研究[ J ]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2013,30( 2 ):296 - 301.
[ 24 ] Crawford R J, Mainwaring D E. The influence of surfactant adsor-
ption on the surface characterisation of Australian coals[ J ]. Fuel, 2001, 80( 3 ): 313 -320.
[ 25 ] Sokolov I, Zorn G, Nichols J M. A study of molecular adsorption of a cationic surfactant on complex surfaces with atomic force microscopy[ J ]. Analyst, 2015.
[ 26 ] 胡友林,乌效鸣. 煤层气储层水锁损害机理及防水锁剂的研究[ J ]. 煤炭学报,2014,39( 6 ):1 107 - 1 111.
[1]
张书磊1,于海锋1,张 宁1,李 友2. 安居煤矿地应力测试及其应用研究 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2023, 46(3): 18-21,26..
[2]
陈 宇1,安峰江2. 九龙矿开采对地下水资源量影响研究 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2023, 46(3): 53-55.
[3]
魏 征,罗化峰, 李通达. 煤液化残渣综合利用研究进展 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2023, 46(12): 85-89.
[4]
薛永升1,2. 新型低氯煤炭运输用防冻液的开发及应用评价 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2023, 46(10): 123-126.
[5]
尹茂胜1,赵仁宝2,孟圣师2,郑义宁2. 郭屯煤矿地应力分布规律研究 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2022, 45(7): 74-77.
[6]
赵晓胜1,周自成1,王 倩2,徐 美1,庞亚恒1,孔令伟1. 油页岩灰基NaX型沸石的合成及表征 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2022, 45(7): 145-149,160..
[7]
付小锦1,2,张长青1. 天津地区聚煤特征分析及勘查方向 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2022, 45(6): 49-52.
[8]
耿琳柯,段 硕. 含水页岩甲烷吸附研究进展 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2022, 45(1): 135-140,143..
[9]
李江平. 综放工作面综合防灭火技术应用研究 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2021, 44(5): 87-90.
[10]
刘海哲. 煤柱优化在解放煤炭资源中的研究应用 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2021, 44(2): 19-23.
[11]
杨廷超. 煤矿矿井水处理技术及资源化综合利用 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2021, 44(12): 61-63,68..
[12]
张健雅. 河北省大城-文安区页岩气地质条件分析 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2021, 44(1): 38-42.
[13]
王继伟1,赵志义1,赵立松2. 安徽省页岩气勘查开发的战略思考与展望 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2020, 43(8): 36-40.
[14]
韩晓丽. 波阻抗反演技术在煤炭资源储量管理中的应用 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2020, 43(7): 72-74,78.
[15]
胡大为. 脱硫石膏-赤泥-铁尾矿复合煤炭替代材料制备及应用 [J]. 煤炭与化工, 2020, 43(5): 132-135,141.