|
|
|
| Determination of fecal coliform group in water——comparison of enzyme substrate method and fluorescence spectrophotometry |
| Zhang Yin1，Liu Xinan2，Wang Jing3，Liu Juan3 |
| 1. Hebei Province Ecology Environmental Monitoring Center, Shijiazhuang 050035, China; 2. China South to North Water Diversion Group Middle Route Corporartion Ltd., Hebei Brancht, Shijiazhuang 050035, China; 3. Shijiazhuang Hi-tech Industrial Development Zone Water Supply and Drainage company, Shijiazhuang 050035, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Enzyme substrate method and fluorescence spectrophotometry were used to detect fecal coliform group in source water, landscape water and sewage. Compared with the method of enzyme substrate and fluorophotometry, the result of fluorophotometry is less relative error, closer to the true value and more accurate. The relative standard deviation of fluorometric method was lower than that of enzyme substrate method, indicating that the stability of fluorometric method was better than that of enzyme substrate method. Two methods were used to determine different types of samples, and the results were statistically analyzed. It was found that the two methods had correlation in statistics, and there was no significant difference. The fluorometric method can be used to determine fecal coliform group in a short time, reduce the human error and avoid the influence of the measuring time on the results, especially suitable for emergency detection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ 1 ] （HJ1001-2018）水质总大肠菌群、粪大肠菌群和大肠埃希
氏菌的测定 酶底物法[ S ]．北京：中国环境出版集团．
[ 2 ] 刘 芳，吴晓磊. 指示水体病原污染的微生物及其检测[ J ].环境工程学报， 2007，1（ 2 ）：139 - 144.
[ 3 ] 徐庄艳. 水中粪大肠菌群酶底物法、滤膜法与多管发酵法的比较[ J ]. 净水技术，2022，41（ S1 ）：356 - 359.
[ 4 ] 王晋宇，赵旭坤，郭志宇，等. 酶底物法与多管发酵法检测粪大肠菌群 差异分析[ J ]. 中国给水排水，2012，28（ 20 ）：139 - 141.
[ 5 ] 曹新垲， 张 琦， 尹宝国，等. 水中粪大肠菌群 3 种检测方法的比较[ J ]. 净水技术2022，41（ 11 ）：173 - 178
[ 6 ] 王 静， 王 聪， 鲍兴敏，等. 酶底物法检测包装饮用水中铜绿假单胞菌方法比对[ J ]. 净水技术，2023，42（ 7 ）：176 - 182.
[ 7 ] 姚 静，刘若楠，王 聪，等. 生活饮用水中菌落总数的测定方法优化[ J ]. 中外食品工业，2023，21（ 11 ）：55 - 57. |
|
|
|
