|
|
|
| Influence analysis of sensor installation method on the time-domain characteristics of microseismic signals in roadway |
| Chen Fude1, Wang Chenglai2, Xia Hui1, Tian Jiahao2, Zhang Aihua1, Zhang Mingwei2, Tian Zhuangcai2 |
| 1. Xinji No.2 Mine, China Coal Xinji Energy Co., Ltd., Huainan 232001, China; 2. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Two methods were used to install microseismic sensors in roadway of Xinji No.2 Mine, namely the rigid connection installation of fully anchored anchor rods and the installation of drilling grouting adhesive rock walls. A week long microseismic test was conducted, and a total of 553 microseismic events were collected to compare and analyze the time-domain characteristics of microseismic signals. Research had found that the maximum amplitude of microseismic signals received by sensors installed using anchor rods was significantly greater than that of sensors installed using drilling methods, with the average maximum amplitude being about 2.86 times that of sensors installed using drilling methods. The effective signal duration received by sensors installed with anchor rods was longer than that of sensors installed with drilling, and the average effective signal segment length was about 4.41 times that of sensors installed with drilling, indicating that the coupling effect between anchor rods and sensors was better than that of sensors installed with drilling, which was more conducive to data processing and analysis. The peak value, root mean square value, margin factor, and pulse factor of the signal captured by the sensor installed on the anchor rod were all greater than those of the sensor installed on the drill hole, indicating that the sensor installed on the anchor rod had a higher degree of extreme change and energy intensity in capturing the signal, which could provide more basis for identifying microseismic signals. Therefore, the signals obtained from sensors installed with anchor rods had the characteristics of large effective signal amplitude, long duration, and obvious eigenvalues, and the signal quality was higher than that of drilling installation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ 1 ] 程传超，谷雪斌，赵子浩，等. 岩层破裂信号与爆破微震信号特征对比分析[ J ]. 矿业研究与开发，2022，42（ 10 ）：187 - 191.
[ 2 ] 丁 鑫，肖晓春，吕祥锋，等. 煤岩破裂过程电荷信号时-频域特性及降噪研究[ J ]. 煤炭学报，2018，43（ 3 ）：657 - 666.
[ 3 ] 解嘉豪. 基于微震事件“时-频-能”特征分析的工作面隐伏断层预测研究[ J ]. 煤炭工程，2020，52（ 11 ）：114 - 119.
[ 4 ] 李文旭，陈祖煜，唐春安，等. 基于信号时频特征的微震波形识别在岩爆预测中的应用[ J ]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报（中英文），2022，20（ 6 ）：523 - 531，556.
[ 5 ] 李 翔，徐奴文. 微震震源定位研究现状及展望[ J ]. 地球物理学进展，2020，35（ 2 ）：598 - 607.
[ 6 ] 刘向峰，汪有刚. 声发射能量累积与煤岩损伤演化关系初探[ J ]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报（自然科学版），2011，30（ 1 ）：1 - 4.
[ 7 ] 陆菜平，窦林名，吴兴荣，等. 岩体微震监测的频谱分析与信号识别[ J ]. 岩土工程学报，2005（ 7 ）：772 - 775.
[ 8 ] 王 岗，潘一山，李忠华，等. 煤岩破裂裂纹演化过程声-电信号时频特征研究[ J ]. 煤炭科学技术，2018，46（ 10 ）：90 - 98.
[ 9 ] 徐科峰. 基于时域分析法的微震波到时拾取研究[ J ]. 山西建筑，2019，45（ 21 ）：53 - 54.
[ 10 ] 张明伟，窦林名，王占成，等. 深井SOS微震监测系统建设与应用[ J ]. 煤矿开采，2010，15（ 2 ）：16 - 20.
[ 11 ] 袁国涛，张明伟，王 杰，等. 采动覆岩微震分区演化特征的数值模拟研究[ J ]. 煤炭科学技术，2023，51（ 8 ）：36 - 46. |
|
|
|
