|
|
|
| Comparative analysis of logging curves under complex geological structure in Maochang syncline |
| Zhu Zhenbao1, Huang Ping1, Zhou Lei2, Xu Kequan1* |
| 1. Fifth Exploration Team, Shandong Province Bureau of Coal Geology, Jinan 250100, China; 2.Shandong Geological Exploration Institute, Zhonghua Administration of Geology and Mines, Jinan 250100, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The main methods of coal seam contrast in coalfield geological exploration include marker layer method, interlayer spacing method, coal seam characteristics method and logging curve characteristics method. However, under the condition of complex geological structure, a single method is easy to cause high error rate of rock and coal seam correlation. The logging curve is abundant in information, which records the different characteristics of different strata and the subtle differences of the same rock under different geological backgrounds. In this paper, the logging curve was used to compare the details of the coal-bearing strata, and the coal-bearing strata return and fault interpretation under complex geological structure conditions were discussed. The practice showed that the comprehensive contrast of logging curves could improve the accuracy of coal seam return and reduce the error of fault interpretation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ 1 ] 李 宁,徐彬森,武宏亮,等. 人工智能在测井地层评价中的应用现状及前景[ J ]. 石油学报,2021,42( 4 ):508 - 522.
[ 2 ] 徐 风,司兆伟,白松涛,等. 基于测井地质“四性”关系谱的储层评价方法[ J ]. 测井技术,2017,41( 2 ):183 - 188.
[ 3 ] AL-MUDHAFAR W J. Integrating machine learning and data an-
alytics for geostatistical characterization of clastic reservoirs[ J ]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 195: 107837.
[ 4 ] 孙 健,袁子龙,吴丙禹. 利用测井曲线进行地层精细化划分和对比[ J ]. 当代化工,2014,43( 11 ):2 382 - 2 387.
[ 5 ] 《测井学》编写组. 测井学[ M ]. 北京:石油工业出版社,
1998.
[ 6 ] 贵州省自然资源厅. 贵州省织金县猫场向斜煤矿资源储量核实及勘探报告[ R ]. 贵阳:四川得圆岩土工程有限责任公司,2024.
[ 7 ] 徐克全. 东胜煤田巴彦高勒井田煤层对比分析[ J ]. 煤炭与化工,2023,46( 7 ):44 - 47. |
|
|
|